Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
Your pick please
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="blackstar" data-source="post: 743258" data-attributes="member: 47518"><p>Cindy, I have been pondering about your mysterious perception of the large stars in my MW photos. Here are the possible cracks on that matter:</p><p></p><p>(1) Shutter speed too slow causing star trailing effect,</p><p></p><p>(2) Moisture in air producing optical refraction causing light (from stars) spread wide spectrum of color and space (size). There was a medium rain shower that late afternoon after sunset. Until the late-night, the sky cleared up and I had a naked-eye sighting of the dark clear sparkling sky full of twinkling stars, which I couldn't make in my camera preview and review. However, unaware of the moisture in the air at the moment (if true),</p><p></p><p>(3) (probably the most plausible explanation) The geological factor: the site is at 9500 ft elevation and the shooting distance may well reflect the size of objects in images. At first, 10000 ft may seem like nothing if objects are far at infinity. Truth may claim a difference. The following pictures could verify this issue a little, if not completely: #3 is the same #3 as this thread starts, #4 and #5 were taken two nights after at a different site that is at least 2000 ft lower: (#5 was aimed to a different galaxy farther away) Are they showing stars in different sizes? Your judge.</p><p></p><p>#3</p><p>[ATTACH]345447[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>#4</p><p>[ATTACH]345448[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>#5</p><p>[ATTACH]345449[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="blackstar, post: 743258, member: 47518"] Cindy, I have been pondering about your mysterious perception of the large stars in my MW photos. Here are the possible cracks on that matter: (1) Shutter speed too slow causing star trailing effect, (2) Moisture in air producing optical refraction causing light (from stars) spread wide spectrum of color and space (size). There was a medium rain shower that late afternoon after sunset. Until the late-night, the sky cleared up and I had a naked-eye sighting of the dark clear sparkling sky full of twinkling stars, which I couldn't make in my camera preview and review. However, unaware of the moisture in the air at the moment (if true), (3) (probably the most plausible explanation) The geological factor: the site is at 9500 ft elevation and the shooting distance may well reflect the size of objects in images. At first, 10000 ft may seem like nothing if objects are far at infinity. Truth may claim a difference. The following pictures could verify this issue a little, if not completely: #3 is the same #3 as this thread starts, #4 and #5 were taken two nights after at a different site that is at least 2000 ft lower: (#5 was aimed to a different galaxy farther away) Are they showing stars in different sizes? Your judge. #3 [ATTACH=CONFIG]345447._xfImport[/ATTACH] #4 [ATTACH=CONFIG]345448._xfImport[/ATTACH] #5 [ATTACH=CONFIG]345449._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
Your pick please
Top