Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
Your pick please
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="blackstar" data-source="post: 743193" data-attributes="member: 47518"><p>Specifics of the different PP programs and methods used for the three:</p><p>#1: RAW file used with Darktable; complete manual heavy process implementations starting with exp and ending with raw denoise,</p><p></p><p>#2: original Jpg file used with Nik-collections' HDR Efex Pro; Default Preset of Basic group selected; no exp or other filters utilized except the White balance,</p><p></p><p>#3: RAW file used with Aurora HDR (trial version); Natural Preset of Essential group selected; no exp or other filters utilized except the White balance.</p><p></p><p>Was surprised by Aurora HDR's ability to bring out so wide array of (bright) color shades from the faint raw image data. Yet, somehow #3 received only 2 votes (including mine). Still can't decide if to out $99 for the software.</p><p></p><p>The two HDR programs both turn the scene color to grayish and brown-ish shade (closer to real natural color?). Not to my like, so I twisted the white balance (color adjustment) toward blue shade (no impact on the vivid color shades of the MW).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="blackstar, post: 743193, member: 47518"] Specifics of the different PP programs and methods used for the three: #1: RAW file used with Darktable; complete manual heavy process implementations starting with exp and ending with raw denoise, #2: original Jpg file used with Nik-collections' HDR Efex Pro; Default Preset of Basic group selected; no exp or other filters utilized except the White balance, #3: RAW file used with Aurora HDR (trial version); Natural Preset of Essential group selected; no exp or other filters utilized except the White balance. Was surprised by Aurora HDR's ability to bring out so wide array of (bright) color shades from the faint raw image data. Yet, somehow #3 received only 2 votes (including mine). Still can't decide if to out $99 for the software. The two HDR programs both turn the scene color to grayish and brown-ish shade (closer to real natural color?). Not to my like, so I twisted the white balance (color adjustment) toward blue shade (no impact on the vivid color shades of the MW). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Low Light & Night
Your pick please
Top