Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Your number 1 bokeh prime lens??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DraganDL" data-source="post: 293767" data-attributes="member: 18251"><p>For those who are not so well informed on the topic, and might take a look at this thread, let me warn against two quite common misunderstandings/confusions regarding bokeh:</p><p></p><p>1) among the two (or more) similar lenses, whereas one of them is "faster", this "faster" is automatically better "bokeh performer". Like, ABC 50mm f/1.2 got to be better in terms of bokeh than ABC 50mm f/2.0. Why is this belief so common? Because many people confuse the "strength" of the DoF (how strongly is a blurred area suppressed against the focused area) with the bokeh.</p><p></p><p>2) the greater focal length automatically means better bokeh. Like, ABC 105mm f/2.8 must be a better bokeh performer than a ABC 55mm f/2.8. </p><p> </p><p>The quality of bokeh is, basically, estimated on the lens's ability to "separate" the blurred area from the "in-focus" area in an unobtrusive way. But, sometimes, depending on who knows which elements of the specific scenery, the so-called "nervousness" of the bokeh, being generally regarded as "unpleasant" can act quite on the contrary - adding to the "drama" and actually be pleasant (good example: aroy's DSC2955)...</p><p></p><p>This was taken with Nikon AF80-200mm f/4.5-5.6, all-plasticky, dirt-cheap lens:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]83694[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DraganDL, post: 293767, member: 18251"] For those who are not so well informed on the topic, and might take a look at this thread, let me warn against two quite common misunderstandings/confusions regarding bokeh: 1) among the two (or more) similar lenses, whereas one of them is "faster", this "faster" is automatically better "bokeh performer". Like, ABC 50mm f/1.2 got to be better in terms of bokeh than ABC 50mm f/2.0. Why is this belief so common? Because many people confuse the "strength" of the DoF (how strongly is a blurred area suppressed against the focused area) with the bokeh. 2) the greater focal length automatically means better bokeh. Like, ABC 105mm f/2.8 must be a better bokeh performer than a ABC 55mm f/2.8. The quality of bokeh is, basically, estimated on the lens's ability to "separate" the blurred area from the "in-focus" area in an unobtrusive way. But, sometimes, depending on who knows which elements of the specific scenery, the so-called "nervousness" of the bokeh, being generally regarded as "unpleasant" can act quite on the contrary - adding to the "drama" and actually be pleasant (good example: aroy's DSC2955)... This was taken with Nikon AF80-200mm f/4.5-5.6, all-plasticky, dirt-cheap lens: [ATTACH=CONFIG]83694._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Your number 1 bokeh prime lens??
Top