Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RocketCowboy" data-source="post: 548722" data-attributes="member: 25095">Short answer, yes, you'll want the YN-622N.I have 3x YN568s that I use off-camera with my D7100. As you mentioned, they can be triggered using commander mode, but that does require line of sight from the camera body to the speedlight. When I started using soft boxes, I lost that line of sight and needed to go radio. The challenge is, the 568 does not have an internal radio receiver like the 560IV does, so therefore needs a 622 (or 602/603 if shooting manual mode) to sit on top of.Now, Yongnuo is migrating from the original 622N (both transceiver and controller) to the 622N-II. I still have the first model. There are supposed to be some improvements with the II series, but I'm not clear on the interoperability between the I and II units. If you haven't purchased anything 622 related yet, I would probably opt to get both the 622N-TX-II and the 622N-II (I'm 90% certain both the controller and transceiver were being updated).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RocketCowboy, post: 548722, member: 25095"] Short answer, yes, you'll want the YN-622N. I have 3x YN568s that I use off-camera with my D7100. As you mentioned, they can be triggered using commander mode, but that does require line of sight from the camera body to the speedlight. When I started using soft boxes, I lost that line of sight and needed to go radio. The challenge is, the 568 does not have an internal radio receiver like the 560IV does, so therefore needs a 622 (or 602/603 if shooting manual mode) to sit on top of. Now, Yongnuo is migrating from the original 622N (both transceiver and controller) to the 622N-II. I still have the first model. There are supposed to be some improvements with the II series, but I'm not clear on the interoperability between the I and II units. If you haven't purchased anything 622 related yet, I would probably opt to get both the 622N-TX-II and the 622N-II (I'm 90% certain both the controller and transceiver were being updated). [/QUOTE]

Verification