Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D810
Yet another "Should I go FX" question.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aroy" data-source="post: 431513" data-attributes="member: 16090"><p>A better lens will always help. Move from zooms to primes and half your problems are solved.</p><p></p><p>That said, for landscapes an FX sensor has an advantage of both lower noise and wider field of view, so moderately wide prime will work wonders.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand as some one said, if you cannot fill in the DX sensor with your main object, FX will make the matters worse, to solve which you need to upgrade to longer glass (at least 2x FL)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aroy, post: 431513, member: 16090"] A better lens will always help. Move from zooms to primes and half your problems are solved. That said, for landscapes an FX sensor has an advantage of both lower noise and wider field of view, so moderately wide prime will work wonders. On the other hand as some one said, if you cannot fill in the DX sensor with your main object, FX will make the matters worse, to solve which you need to upgrade to longer glass (at least 2x FL) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D810
Yet another "Should I go FX" question.
Top
