Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="rece2000" data-source="post: 363480" data-attributes="member: 15932"><p>i guess i am looking for a more &quot;all around&quot; lens.&nbsp; i actually did purchase the tamron 70-200 but ended up returning it and getting the 85mm instead.&nbsp; it was just too heavy and i wasn't ready to try to attack that yet.&nbsp; i'm not real happy with the quality of my 55-200 lens, but if the other lenses are similar, then you all are right, not worth replacing.&nbsp; i don't think i would ever sell it, but was going to try trading it in and getting the 50 bucks i'd probably get for it just for a little something.&nbsp; i hate to replace my 17-50 2.8, but might actually try to replace that one with one of these other 3 instead.&nbsp; i lose the good aperture, but hoping the image quality would be better than i get with my tamron lens.&nbsp; have never been happy with it, but i keep holding on.&nbsp; i can get by with my 50 and 85 for portraits, at least for now...&nbsp; thanks for all your help!</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="rece2000, post: 363480, member: 15932"] i guess i am looking for a more "all around" lens. i actually did purchase the tamron 70-200 but ended up returning it and getting the 85mm instead. it was just too heavy and i wasn't ready to try to attack that yet. i'm not real happy with the quality of my 55-200 lens, but if the other lenses are similar, then you all are right, not worth replacing. i don't think i would ever sell it, but was going to try trading it in and getting the 50 bucks i'd probably get for it just for a little something. i hate to replace my 17-50 2.8, but might actually try to replace that one with one of these other 3 instead. i lose the good aperture, but hoping the image quality would be better than i get with my tamron lens. have never been happy with it, but i keep holding on. i can get by with my 50 and 85 for portraits, at least for now... thanks for all your help! [/QUOTE]

Verification