Working with a long exposure image

Clovishound

Senior Member
Don't know if this would be better in the evaluation section, but since I hope to get a discussion and some back and forth, I will post it here.

I impulsively posted this image in the weekly challenge before I had thought the editing through. I would like to briefly go through the shooting and editing process with an eye toward advise for editing this image, and reshooting this location with some changes.

This was shot early morning at a somewhat local beach. I used a 10 stop ND filter on my Z7ii with the 24-70 F4 set at 41mm, F8 and ISO 64. I believe I shot it at 60 sec. My camera listed exposures over 30 sec as 30sec in the metadata. My intention was to get that nice foggy look for the water. Unfortunately there was minimal wave action, which dialed back that foggy look.

This is the completely unedited image. Note: This is from the JPG straight out of the camera. I use RAW + JPG and use the JPG versions as backup, as they are saved on a separate card. This version is close to what I remember seeing at the time.

_DSC1458-4.jpg


I cropped it somewhat, and brought out color in the sky in LR using masks. I also made a few changes to the foreground to make it a little more pleasing. I then decided to remove the rather distracting (IMO) items to the left of the tree. I felt the small items in front of the tree added to the image and left them. Here is this version.

_DSC1458-2-3-2.jpg


I then tried it in B&W. That's where some issues began. I really liked the B&W better. The big issue was the sky. I tried a number of things to get the look I wanted. I had big issues with the different colors rendering different greys. I use the color sliders in the B&W editing in LR, and had to resort to more masking to get some of the areas to look right. Note, this version is a little different than the one I posted in the weekly challenge.

_DSC1458-3-3.jpg



Any feedback on editing appreciated. I am thinking about starting from scratch with the NEF file and see if I can come up with a cleaner version. I ended up doing a lot of masking small areas of the sky to clean up a few odd looking areas, and perhaps a different strategy might result in these not being necessary, and achieving a more natural look.

I am also looking at shooting this again. It's a day trip, and requires getting up very early in the morning and driving and hour and a half to get there. I also have to plan it with the tides, sunrise times, and weather, if I want to do a sunrise shot. Bottom line is I can't just run out and reshoot it this afternoon, I must plan it out, and the tides have a two week cycle. Tides have a narrow window when the tree is still in the water, and the tide low enough to get close enough to shoot. I have considered going later in the morning and shooting this with full sunlight. That may be a mistake, as it will not have the overall soft look I have here. Feedback for changes in a reshoot appreciated. This is my new favorite tree at this beach. My previous favorite did not survive last years storm season.

FYI, I don't have a lot of experience with long exposure work, so this is a learning process for me.
 

Needa

Senior Member
Challenge Team
Having shot the same lighthouse for several years now good luck with planning. :) Now there are some thing that work out like knowing were and when the sun will rise at a certain time of the year and in your case the tides will increase your odds. I now just go when I feel like it and try to make the best out of it. I also don't shoot long exposure other than in low light so hopefully you will get better advise.
I like both of your edits although I probably left the next three rocks or stumps in the image to sort of unbalance it and maybe shift the tree slightly right, ever so slightly.
Have you thought about doing something with the horizon on the left so you have a smooth transition to the sky.

Looking forward to seeing what you come up with. (y)
 

Clovishound

Senior Member
With this site, planning is required. You not only have to look at the high tide times, you have to look at how high the tide will be. We thought we had it all figured out, and earlier this year we got up at 4AM and drove down there, only to find that the tide was still too high to even get on the beach. Turns out it was an extremely high tide, and winds made it worse. Add to that the landscape can change rapidly. It was fairly static for several years, then, sometime last year the treeline moved back significantly. There was a quarter mile stretch of trees between the beach and the marsh that suddenly went into the ocean. The current condition of the beach is not as conducive to photography as it was before. And don't get me started about the gnats. Still, it is a wonderful spot to photograph despite the challenges.

Have you thought about doing something with the horizon on the left so you have a smooth transition to the sky.


_DSC1458-4-2.jpg
 

Clovishound

Senior Member
Thought I'd post this for contrast. I was giving the RAW files another look to see if I had overlooked something that needed editing. I found this image that was taken 3 minutes later from a different angle. It doesn't resonate with me as well as the first one. I did remove all the other root balls and branches to support a minimalist effect. I suspect the reason I don't like it as well is the sand in the foreground. The sun may be another distraction. I could remove the dark area just above the horizon, but I would probably run into trouble with the sun.

_DSC1465-2-3.jpg


And here's the color version.

_DSC1465-4.jpg
 

BF Hammer

Senior Member
The color version with the sun above horizon finally speaks to me. I see where you are going with the BW versions, but just not quite getting there. When you take away the color you almost need turbulence in the water to add contrast to the more tranquil tree.
 

blackstar

Senior Member
...



I cropped it somewhat, and brought out color in the sky in LR using masks. I also made a few changes to the foreground to make it a little more pleasing. I then decided to remove the rather distracting (IMO) items to the left of the tree. I felt the small items in front of the tree added to the image and left them. Here is this version.

View attachment 411719

I then tried it in B&W. That's where some issues began. I really liked the B&W better. The big issue was the sky. I tried a number of things to get the look I wanted. I had big issues with the different colors rendering different greys. I use the color sliders in the B&W editing in LR, and had to resort to more masking to get some of the areas to look right. Note, this version is a little different than the one I posted in the weekly challenge.

View attachment 411720
...
I like the color version better than the B&W version, which is somewhat boring. However, the color version displays a rather "dull" color scene, especially the dark grey color above the horizon. It's more like a late sunset rather than a sunrise...
 

Clovishound

Senior Member
Well, for me it was just about drawing the eye down and away from the tree and the sun. The first image posted has a minimalist simplicity with the contrast between the soft water and the harsh, crisp lines of the tree. Yes, there are the small branches and the reflection of the tree trunk to draw the eye, but those seem to add, rather than distract. I don't find the sand to be a distraction in the color version, for some reason. I just now removed the footprints from the B&W, and I do like it better, although I still prefer the color version.


_DSC1465-2-3-2.jpg
 
Top