Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 461175" data-attributes="member: 13090">Fine tuning AF pretty much defines &quot;suck&quot;, yes... Has to be done though, IMO. And you know, I have to give kudos to Sigma: not only are they turning out some of the best glass on the planet, they put out things like the USB Dock which, to my knowledge anyway, is unique. And lets think about this... Four different focus ranges for a prime lens and, and for zooms, you get the same but also at four different focal lengths?!! Holy cow... Personally I'm glad it was Sigma that did this and NOT Nikon because if Nikon HAD done this, they would not have done it this well. The Sigma dock is so simple, so elegant and the solution is, as far as I can tell, perfect.I like my Nikon camera's, make no mistake, but I think Nikon, as a corporate entity, is sadly out of touch with it's user base....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 461175, member: 13090"] Fine tuning AF pretty much defines "suck", yes... Has to be done though, IMO. And you know, I have to give kudos to Sigma: not only are they turning out some of the best glass on the planet, they put out things like the USB Dock which, to my knowledge anyway, is unique. And lets think about this... Four different focus ranges for a prime lens and, and for zooms, you get the same but also at four different [I]focal lengths[/I]?!! Holy cow... Personally I'm glad it was Sigma that did this and NOT Nikon because if Nikon HAD done this, they would not have done it this well. The Sigma dock is so simple, so elegant and the solution is, as far as I can tell, perfect. I like my Nikon camera's, make no mistake, but I think Nikon, as a corporate entity, is sadly out of touch with it's user base. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"]...[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification