Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="aZuMi" data-source="post: 65209" data-attributes="member: 10045">Ohh i see. That's definitely part of the issue with 24-70mm. It will be 36-105mm on a DX camera and kinda defeats the purpose of getting wider lenses (since not wide enough).The biggest drawback of 17-55mm is the DX format and it'll have pronounced vignette on the wide end.The reason for this question is, would you prefer fairly faster primes 1.8 (1.4 is too expensive) and fairly fast UWA?Or is the proven 24-70mm 2.8 the way to go while losing the wide end?Or....the middle of the pack 17-55mm 2.8?</blockquote>