Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="aZuMi" data-source="post: 65089" data-attributes="member: 10045">I have a question on the best way I can setup my bag.So far, I have 80-200mm 2.8, 50mm 1.8 on my D90 and I'm looking for an efficient way to fill my bag. Here are my options:1. Can get relatively quickly as it's the cheapest alternative. If I buy used, it can only ru me up to $900 CAD- Nikkor 28mm 1.8G or 35mm 1.8G- Tokina 11-16mm 2.82. I will have to wait a little bit longer (few months) to buy this due to other obligations. But overall cost used will be around $900 CAD mark. (Brand new over $1200). Haven't tried this yet, but it's an alternative to 24-70mm 2.8 (if you call it alternative)- Nikkor 17-55mm 2.8 DX3. I will definitely have to save several months to get this piece of glass. But I've shot with this lens and the quality, colour and sharpness were just on point. Biggest drawback is it's missing the wide end, which I would like to have.- Nikkor 24-70mm 2.8I figured each option has its pros and cons, and I'd rather shoot than hem and haw by looking at my bank account to have enough saved for the lens. But my question is, which option would you prefer and why?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="aZuMi, post: 65089, member: 10045"] I have a question on the best way I can setup my bag.So far, I have 80-200mm 2.8, 50mm 1.8 on my D90 and I'm looking for an efficient way to fill my bag. Here are my options: 1. Can get relatively quickly as it's the cheapest alternative. If I buy used, it can only ru me up to $900 CAD - Nikkor 28mm 1.8G or 35mm 1.8G - Tokina 11-16mm 2.8 2. I will have to wait a little bit longer (few months) to buy this due to other obligations. But overall cost used will be around $900 CAD mark. (Brand new over $1200). Haven't tried this yet, but it's an alternative to 24-70mm 2.8 (if you call it alternative) - Nikkor 17-55mm 2.8 DX 3. I will definitely have to save several months to get this piece of glass. But I've shot with this lens and the quality, colour and sharpness were just on point. Biggest drawback is it's missing the wide end, which I would like to have. - Nikkor 24-70mm 2.8 I figured each option has its pros and cons, and I'd rather shoot than hem and haw by looking at my bank account to have enough saved for the lens. But my question is, which option would you prefer and why? [/QUOTE]

Verification