Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="reverb" data-source="post: 268988" data-attributes="member: 16378">OK, this isn't as rude a question as perhaps the title suggests.&nbsp; However, it is a genuine newbie question.&nbsp;My first Nikon DSLR, as I've mentioned elsewhere, is a D3200.&nbsp;&nbsp; I really enjoy using it, and find it both comfortable and&nbsp; straightforward.&nbsp; It allows me to learn Manual picture taking, and is&nbsp; fine at fairly high ISO when I'm shooting in low light.&nbsp; My only gripe at the moment is Weather Proofing, which I hadn't realised how much I would want (and I've bought something else to cover this aspect).&nbsp;Posts I've read are clear, of course, that no camera or lens will make a&nbsp; bad picture good, and ultimate determinant of a good picture is a good&nbsp; photographer.&nbsp; Once that is in place, all posts seem to suggest that&nbsp; it's the lens that makes the difference.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;So what is it that makes an upgrade from the lower-end to a high-end so important?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="reverb, post: 268988, member: 16378"] OK, this isn't as rude a question as perhaps the title suggests. However, it is a genuine newbie question. My first Nikon DSLR, as I've mentioned elsewhere, is a D3200. I really enjoy using it, and find it both comfortable and straightforward. It allows me to learn Manual picture taking, and is fine at fairly high ISO when I'm shooting in low light. My only gripe at the moment is Weather Proofing, which I hadn't realised how much I would want (and I've bought something else to cover this aspect). Posts I've read are clear, of course, that no camera or lens will make a bad picture good, and ultimate determinant of a good picture is a good photographer. Once that is in place, all posts seem to suggest that it's the lens that makes the difference. So what is it that makes an upgrade from the lower-end to a high-end so important? [/QUOTE]

Verification