Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Imported content
Blog Archive
Why Not a Blog 97
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stmv" data-source="post: 795173" data-attributes="member: 10038"><p>I had a discussion yesterday with a non photographer,, who is always asking me if a posted photo had been PhotoShop.... she won't like a picture if it has been photoshopped, wants it natural..</p><p></p><p>which of course cracks me up,, just where does the public gets this concept of natural photographs is interesting to me. </p><p></p><p>I think that part of the negative image is the view of people pictures being changed to make more thinner, or whatever, </p><p></p><p>Most of my photoshop work is pretty light touch,,, typically, levels, spot removal, leveling, cropping, with the occasionally cloning of some irratating object. </p><p></p><p>Sure,, sometimes I play with mm slightly increased mountain height, more dramatic lighting, spot lighting, replacement of a sky, or sometimes merges of pictures,, </p><p></p><p>but, I am not hung up on natural photography, if the finish product is pleasing to the eye, then I am happy whether straight from the snapshot or a photographed finished product.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stmv, post: 795173, member: 10038"] I had a discussion yesterday with a non photographer,, who is always asking me if a posted photo had been PhotoShop.... she won't like a picture if it has been photoshopped, wants it natural.. which of course cracks me up,, just where does the public gets this concept of natural photographs is interesting to me. I think that part of the negative image is the view of people pictures being changed to make more thinner, or whatever, Most of my photoshop work is pretty light touch,,, typically, levels, spot removal, leveling, cropping, with the occasionally cloning of some irratating object. Sure,, sometimes I play with mm slightly increased mountain height, more dramatic lighting, spot lighting, replacement of a sky, or sometimes merges of pictures,, but, I am not hung up on natural photography, if the finish product is pleasing to the eye, then I am happy whether straight from the snapshot or a photographed finished product. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Imported content
Blog Archive
Why Not a Blog 97
Top