Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="stmv" data-source="post: 796493" data-attributes="member: 10038">some folks really amaze me, I was speaking to a photographer, and like me he does not make a living, and takes a lot less pictures then me due to time (has a young family), anyway, we were talking gear, and he went down just part of his current list, that included the d800, the modern trio of 14-24, 24-70, and 70-210 2.8s,&nbsp; and the latest primes including the 24 1.4,and I am like wow!&nbsp; talk about the setup. I figure he had 12K just in that lineup. My trio is 2 generations back,&nbsp; and I am not rushing out to get the latest . I would almost feel too much pressure for awesome shots with that line up of the absolute bests lens. So,, what did I take out today for my shoot,&nbsp; let me see, the ancient 20mm 3.5,&nbsp; 60 mm 2.8 micro D (love this lens0, and an ancient 200 mm F4 52 mm small), three small primes that fit in my small side pockets of my pack.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="stmv, post: 796493, member: 10038"] some folks really amaze me, I was speaking to a photographer, and like me he does not make a living, and takes a lot less pictures then me due to time (has a young family), anyway, we were talking gear, and he went down just part of his current list, that included the d800, the modern trio of 14-24, 24-70, and 70-210 2.8s, and the latest primes including the 24 1.4,and I am like wow! talk about the setup. I figure he had 12K just in that lineup. My trio is 2 generations back, and I am not rushing out to get the latest . I would almost feel too much pressure for awesome shots with that line up of the absolute bests lens. So,, what did I take out today for my shoot, let me see, the ancient 20mm 3.5, 60 mm 2.8 micro D (love this lens0, and an ancient 200 mm F4 52 mm small), three small primes that fit in my small side pockets of my pack. [/QUOTE]

Verification