Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Imported content
Blog Archive
Why not a Blog 5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stmv" data-source="post: 796446" data-attributes="member: 10038"><p>I might be one of the few that don't get all that excited about image stablizer in lens. to me, they just add bulk, size and cost. I tend to use a tripod when the conditions are not right and have to turn the VR off anyway when on tripod, then I forget to turn it back on hand holding, kinda a pain. When I hand hold, tend to be on bright days, with fast shutters like 1/500 or faster, so, the VR just is not needed. </p><p></p><p>but, I understand that the market is driving it. VR in primes.. yuck. but, coming,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stmv, post: 796446, member: 10038"] I might be one of the few that don't get all that excited about image stablizer in lens. to me, they just add bulk, size and cost. I tend to use a tripod when the conditions are not right and have to turn the VR off anyway when on tripod, then I forget to turn it back on hand holding, kinda a pain. When I hand hold, tend to be on bright days, with fast shutters like 1/500 or faster, so, the VR just is not needed. but, I understand that the market is driving it. VR in primes.. yuck. but, coming, [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Imported content
Blog Archive
Why not a Blog 5
Top
