Brrrrrr now it is cold.. only 47 degrees on my hike today! way too cold.
I read that article on the guy switching gear to a Sony mirrorless DX type of setup. First, for me the controls on these small
cameras are a pain, and you loose too much in DOF control.. and then you read of the oh the LCDs oh so perfect,, right,,,, still not the
image thru the glass. and you know that sucks battery life.
I won't fight progress, when Nikon comes out with a full frame, mirrorless camera that works with my legacy lens at say 60 MEG range,, with expanded dynamic range (that lets me dial it in) etc etc etc, sure
I would like it to stay in the size of a D7000, with great controls. but,, why mirrorless
Two reasons: 1. DUST!!! AND NO MORE DUST
2. I am not convinced that Nikon can maintained the quality with their complex mirror/shutter world, let's face it ,,,, pressure is always to reduce cost.. and quality,,
So a mirrorless system,, reduces complexity, and less moving parts, which should translate to ..... quality.
but,,, I will miss that shutter sound.
I read that article on the guy switching gear to a Sony mirrorless DX type of setup. First, for me the controls on these small
cameras are a pain, and you loose too much in DOF control.. and then you read of the oh the LCDs oh so perfect,, right,,,, still not the
image thru the glass. and you know that sucks battery life.
I won't fight progress, when Nikon comes out with a full frame, mirrorless camera that works with my legacy lens at say 60 MEG range,, with expanded dynamic range (that lets me dial it in) etc etc etc, sure
I would like it to stay in the size of a D7000, with great controls. but,, why mirrorless
Two reasons: 1. DUST!!! AND NO MORE DUST
2. I am not convinced that Nikon can maintained the quality with their complex mirror/shutter world, let's face it ,,,, pressure is always to reduce cost.. and quality,,
So a mirrorless system,, reduces complexity, and less moving parts, which should translate to ..... quality.
but,,, I will miss that shutter sound.