Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Imported content
Blog Archive
Why Not a Blog 11
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stmv" data-source="post: 796667" data-attributes="member: 10038"><p>I found the Oscars to be very good for photo editing, not that exciting of a show, but then again, during the time that the software was cranking away, a good diversion. </p><p></p><p>Which is why I have the TV on typically when I am editing photos, because there is a lot of dead time, so,, between the two, seems to be a right balance.</p><p></p><p>I have not been a batch type of photographer, well, because it seems that I am tweaking every photo differently, so, I don't have a set sequence that I would do on a large number of photos, so settng up the batch process would cost more time then just doing the edtis. </p><p></p><p>I also, tend not to take a lot of shots on any one subject. This is actually a bad habit, comes from my film days when shots meant money, and well, you could blow thru a roll of film in no time. So, I tend to take maybe a few shots and then get back home, and go darn,, why did I not take more shots! </p><p></p><p>On the otherhand, maybe that is the challenge, to get the shot right in the fewest possible shots, because that way you will be ready, when you only get the one moment to take the shot (sounds like hunting).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stmv, post: 796667, member: 10038"] I found the Oscars to be very good for photo editing, not that exciting of a show, but then again, during the time that the software was cranking away, a good diversion. Which is why I have the TV on typically when I am editing photos, because there is a lot of dead time, so,, between the two, seems to be a right balance. I have not been a batch type of photographer, well, because it seems that I am tweaking every photo differently, so, I don't have a set sequence that I would do on a large number of photos, so settng up the batch process would cost more time then just doing the edtis. I also, tend not to take a lot of shots on any one subject. This is actually a bad habit, comes from my film days when shots meant money, and well, you could blow thru a roll of film in no time. So, I tend to take maybe a few shots and then get back home, and go darn,, why did I not take more shots! On the otherhand, maybe that is the challenge, to get the shot right in the fewest possible shots, because that way you will be ready, when you only get the one moment to take the shot (sounds like hunting). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Imported content
Blog Archive
Why Not a Blog 11
Top