Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Imported content
Blog Archive
Why Not a Blog 11
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stmv" data-source="post: 796664" data-attributes="member: 10038"><p>so often we hear the advice,, lens lens lens,, and camera second,,, </p><p></p><p>but,, I kinda disagree, my vote is camera first, lens second, for the primary reason that the camera is your primary tool controlling so much of your decision making even down to what portion of the lens catalog and history is available to you. </p><p></p><p>I actually advise getting the right camera, with the right quality, and even if you cannot afford more, then start with the 50 mm prime 110 dollar lens. </p><p></p><p>You can have a 2000 dollar 2.8 lens, but without knowledge and control of the camera and skills in compositio, might as well hang the lens on the wall, </p><p></p><p>I view lens kinda as the gravy of the journey, as the skills with the camera grows, so will your thirst to tailor the lens to the shot, or the thirst to squeeze out the last pixel quality possible, or that ever lasting thirst of fast lens or longest reach or widest reach, etc. </p><p></p><p>but,, first.. its the camera and you knowledge that should come first... or well, my opinion for whatever that is worth..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stmv, post: 796664, member: 10038"] so often we hear the advice,, lens lens lens,, and camera second,,, but,, I kinda disagree, my vote is camera first, lens second, for the primary reason that the camera is your primary tool controlling so much of your decision making even down to what portion of the lens catalog and history is available to you. I actually advise getting the right camera, with the right quality, and even if you cannot afford more, then start with the 50 mm prime 110 dollar lens. You can have a 2000 dollar 2.8 lens, but without knowledge and control of the camera and skills in compositio, might as well hang the lens on the wall, I view lens kinda as the gravy of the journey, as the skills with the camera grows, so will your thirst to tailor the lens to the shot, or the thirst to squeeze out the last pixel quality possible, or that ever lasting thirst of fast lens or longest reach or widest reach, etc. but,, first.. its the camera and you knowledge that should come first... or well, my opinion for whatever that is worth.. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Imported content
Blog Archive
Why Not a Blog 11
Top