Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Why Bother!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Browncoat" data-source="post: 4325" data-attributes="member: 1061"><p>I'd be interested in seeing the age demographic for the replies posted in this thread.</p><p></p><p>The general feeling here is that there is something wrong or shameful with editing images. Or that those who do editing lack basic skill sets as a photographer. One could easily argue the flip side of the coin and say that those who use straight out of the camera photos lack artistic vision or technical know-how.</p><p></p><p>This had to be how Henry Ford felt. I'm sure he got all kinds of questioning glances as he puttered down the streets in his mechanical contraption as the drivers of horse-drawn carriages looked on in horror and disgust. Or how weird Thomas Edison must have seemed as he tried to develop the light bulb while his peers wrote their manuscripts by gaslight.</p><p></p><p>We all know someone who does it old-school. There's a guy down the street from me who still uses one of those rotary blade lawnmowers. He swears that his grass grows greener because of it. The point is, one way is not better than the other. And odds are high that you're not going to change the next guy's mind and persuade him that your way is better.</p><p></p><p>Photography is an art form. More power to those who want to stick with the basics, but I'll take my digital toolbox any day of week and twice on Sunday.</p><p></p><p><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Browncoat, post: 4325, member: 1061"] I'd be interested in seeing the age demographic for the replies posted in this thread. The general feeling here is that there is something wrong or shameful with editing images. Or that those who do editing lack basic skill sets as a photographer. One could easily argue the flip side of the coin and say that those who use straight out of the camera photos lack artistic vision or technical know-how. This had to be how Henry Ford felt. I'm sure he got all kinds of questioning glances as he puttered down the streets in his mechanical contraption as the drivers of horse-drawn carriages looked on in horror and disgust. Or how weird Thomas Edison must have seemed as he tried to develop the light bulb while his peers wrote their manuscripts by gaslight. We all know someone who does it old-school. There's a guy down the street from me who still uses one of those rotary blade lawnmowers. He swears that his grass grows greener because of it. The point is, one way is not better than the other. And odds are high that you're not going to change the next guy's mind and persuade him that your way is better. Photography is an art form. More power to those who want to stick with the basics, but I'll take my digital toolbox any day of week and twice on Sunday. :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Why Bother!
Top