Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Why Bother!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LensWork" data-source="post: 4316" data-attributes="member: 1283"><p>I always shoot in raw, and I rarely "alter" the image. I will occasionally "enhance" an image by way of minor adjustments to contrast, saturation and of course cropping. My background is in photojournalism so "altering" an image is something that is just not done. I was taught early that enhancements like contrast, density, dodging and burning were acceptable tools to improve image quality, but such things like changing the color of an object, or even removing/adding an object was strictly forbidden. Even cropping must be done with care so that the final image accurately represents the scene, and that no significant object that altered the perception of the scene was omitted. </p><p></p><p>The only time that I have altered an image was for a product shot. The client was a camera bag manufacturer whose product had a grommet for headphones. The only earbuds that I had available during the shoot were of a color that clashed with the color of the bag, so in the final image the earbuds were desaturated so they appeared to be white. Since this was for a product catalog and not a news image, I was OK with the manipulation.</p><p></p><p>I have no issues with those that manipulate images of an artistic nature, though sometimes I think some go too far in over-saturating, etc., but photography is an art, and to each their own.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LensWork, post: 4316, member: 1283"] I always shoot in raw, and I rarely "alter" the image. I will occasionally "enhance" an image by way of minor adjustments to contrast, saturation and of course cropping. My background is in photojournalism so "altering" an image is something that is just not done. I was taught early that enhancements like contrast, density, dodging and burning were acceptable tools to improve image quality, but such things like changing the color of an object, or even removing/adding an object was strictly forbidden. Even cropping must be done with care so that the final image accurately represents the scene, and that no significant object that altered the perception of the scene was omitted. The only time that I have altered an image was for a product shot. The client was a camera bag manufacturer whose product had a grommet for headphones. The only earbuds that I had available during the shoot were of a color that clashed with the color of the bag, so in the final image the earbuds were desaturated so they appeared to be white. Since this was for a product catalog and not a news image, I was OK with the manipulation. I have no issues with those that manipulate images of an artistic nature, though sometimes I think some go too far in over-saturating, etc., but photography is an art, and to each their own. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Why Bother!
Top