Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7100
Why are people saying that a 300mm is too small for wildlife photography
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scott Murray" data-source="post: 509120" data-attributes="member: 9753"><p>Try getting a black necked stork with a 300mm?! Even a 600mm is no good if they spot you and they are a BIG stork, also getting finches to fill the frame is hard at 600mm let alone 600mm. But sure 300 is great for big game that is not skittish, it all depends on the wildlife you are shooting, getting that elusive Siberian tiger in Siberia I know what lens I would be packing <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scott Murray, post: 509120, member: 9753"] Try getting a black necked stork with a 300mm?! Even a 600mm is no good if they spot you and they are a BIG stork, also getting finches to fill the frame is hard at 600mm let alone 600mm. But sure 300 is great for big game that is not skittish, it all depends on the wildlife you are shooting, getting that elusive Siberian tiger in Siberia I know what lens I would be packing :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7100
Why are people saying that a 300mm is too small for wildlife photography
Top
