Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7100
Why are people saying that a 300mm is too small for wildlife photography
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dragonfly" data-source="post: 509109" data-attributes="member: 41029"><p>Actually I have hundreds of up close White tail and black bear shots taken at 200mm, so I already know that 300mm is sufficient, however I do not know if f4 will make me happy. <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/camera-lenses/af-s-nikkor-300mm-f%252f4d-if-ed.html" target="_blank">AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/4D IF-ED from Nikon</a> No VR is a plus though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dragonfly, post: 509109, member: 41029"] Actually I have hundreds of up close White tail and black bear shots taken at 200mm, so I already know that 300mm is sufficient, however I do not know if f4 will make me happy. [url=http://www.nikonusa.com/en/nikon-products/product/camera-lenses/af-s-nikkor-300mm-f%252f4d-if-ed.html]AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/4D IF-ED from Nikon[/url] No VR is a plus though. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
D7100
Why are people saying that a 300mm is too small for wildlife photography
Top
