Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikonites
Feedback and Suggestions
Why are my images ADVERTISING for CORKBOARD.com??????
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eye-level" data-source="post: 146673" data-attributes="member: 6548"><p>I have done lots of film printing but very little digital printing. What is the "safest" size image to post on any given online site that would still allow for nice resolution photos on a monitor yet make so that a 8 X 10 print would look like crap? That is the first thing I would like to discuss.</p><p></p><p>When I started my Area 52 thread in 365 category I used photobucket. So if you look at the beginning pages of my thread the images suck (in more ways then one too LOL) but seriously the quality of them on the monitor is crappy but I assure you the prints and the original files are much cleaner and crisp. Then I changed to Flickr which helped out a whole lot. Then I started messing with sizing them and the quality sort of went all over the map even with Flickr used as the host. Now I am hosting from my own server space and using bitmap files they are better than anything previous...soon I am going RAW and using DNG and other formats to present my stuff.</p><p></p><p>So what I am thinking is how do we get the best looking images for posting online without enabling someone to just right click on them download print and then sell on Ebay for example? (See related thread Ebay and Copyright Infringement) What sort of parameters and file sizes and type do we use?</p><p></p><p>Rick I know you print a running ton of digital photos... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> what do you see? Can you make a great 8 X 10 from a say 400 X 600 jpeg?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eye-level, post: 146673, member: 6548"] I have done lots of film printing but very little digital printing. What is the "safest" size image to post on any given online site that would still allow for nice resolution photos on a monitor yet make so that a 8 X 10 print would look like crap? That is the first thing I would like to discuss. When I started my Area 52 thread in 365 category I used photobucket. So if you look at the beginning pages of my thread the images suck (in more ways then one too LOL) but seriously the quality of them on the monitor is crappy but I assure you the prints and the original files are much cleaner and crisp. Then I changed to Flickr which helped out a whole lot. Then I started messing with sizing them and the quality sort of went all over the map even with Flickr used as the host. Now I am hosting from my own server space and using bitmap files they are better than anything previous...soon I am going RAW and using DNG and other formats to present my stuff. So what I am thinking is how do we get the best looking images for posting online without enabling someone to just right click on them download print and then sell on Ebay for example? (See related thread Ebay and Copyright Infringement) What sort of parameters and file sizes and type do we use? Rick I know you print a running ton of digital photos... ;) what do you see? Can you make a great 8 X 10 from a say 400 X 600 jpeg? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikonites
Feedback and Suggestions
Why are my images ADVERTISING for CORKBOARD.com??????
Top