Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 754088" data-attributes="member: 13196">I have the Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G lens which is an FX lens. It just isn't quite wide enough. And my 14mm f/2.8 tends to stretch the edges of the images because it can be too wide. Even if I put it on a DX body, that would give a field of view of 21mm which is still too wide. But the extra 2mm of the 16-35mm lens should make a difference. There have been times when 18mm left me wanting a little more in the viewfinder than the field of view would allow.Isn't the Sigma a DX lens? That would give a field of view of 24-50mm which wouldn't be wide enough for a lot of architecture images. However it's good to know Sigma is still being made in Japan. The quality of many Japanese products tends to be extremely good. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="hark, post: 754088, member: 13196"] I have the Nikon 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5G lens which is an FX lens. It just isn't quite wide enough. And my 14mm f/2.8 tends to stretch the edges of the images because it can be too wide. Even if I put it on a DX body, that would give a field of view of 21mm which is still too wide. But the extra 2mm of the 16-35mm lens should make a difference. There have been times when 18mm left me wanting a little more in the viewfinder than the field of view would allow. Isn't the Sigma a DX lens? That would give a field of view of 24-50mm which wouldn't be wide enough for a lot of architecture images. However it's good to know Sigma is still being made in Japan. The quality of many Japanese products tends to be extremely good. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification