Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 549441" data-attributes="member: 12496">Well, I would reference the page at <a href="http://www.scantips.com/lights/whitebalance.html" target="_blank">Easy White Balance Correction, fix with or without Raw</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I think (assume) the original question was about camera Custom White Balance.&nbsp; In that case, yes, aiming at the light source is necessary, but I am not aware that camera Custom can handle flash.The easy way is to use raw, and include a white balance card AT THE SUBJECT in the first test shot.&nbsp; Then all session pictures can be adjusted from that, with one click.We should correct white balance for every session.&nbsp; White balance varies with flash power level.&nbsp; Example of this shown at the link above.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 549441, member: 12496"] Well, I would reference the page at [URL="http://www.scantips.com/lights/whitebalance.html"]Easy White Balance Correction, fix with or without Raw[/URL] :) I think (assume) the original question was about camera Custom White Balance. In that case, yes, aiming at the light source is necessary, but I am not aware that camera Custom can handle flash. The easy way is to use raw, and include a white balance card AT THE SUBJECT in the first test shot. Then all session pictures can be adjusted from that, with one click. We should correct white balance for every session. White balance varies with flash power level. Example of this shown at the link above. [/QUOTE]

Verification