Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Stoshowicz" data-source="post: 633362" data-attributes="member: 31397">Yes , I suppose I am saying that a bit ,, in the end , one buys a camera , and keeps their lenses , and wants to see better end result.&nbsp;I do understand why people want to see equivalent exposures but comparing fx to dx and having to use different 'gear' to get similar looking results the comparison is obscured. (&quot;Equivalent exposures ,arrived at differently, have differences in noise and detail&quot;) I doubt Nikon is&nbsp; going to send me a whole set of longer lenses to make up for the FX format of the 750 <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> But for shooting birds , or any small moving objects far away , you just don't have the luxury of filling the frame at will. One walks up to the waters edge , and knows they are going to have to crop in on the duck , and that they have to deal with the light that's available when he takes off. So you want to know how smooth and detailed , you can get the image, for the shutter speed you're forced to use,,,&nbsp; right? You could be correct the results could be close enough to be moot , its just that comparison as done,&nbsp; doesn't allow one to to come to that conclusion based on this comparison , in the situation I would like to know about , mostly because the lenses aren't the same.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Stoshowicz, post: 633362, member: 31397"] Yes , I suppose I am saying that a bit ,, in the end , one buys a camera , and keeps their lenses , and wants to see better end result. I do understand why people want to see equivalent exposures but comparing fx to dx and having to use different 'gear' to get similar looking results the comparison is obscured. [I][SIZE=1]("Equivalent exposures ,arrived at differently, have differences in noise and detail") I doubt Nikon is going to send me a whole set of longer lenses to make up for the FX format of the 750 :) [/SIZE][/I]But for shooting birds , or any small moving objects far away , you just don't have the luxury of filling the frame at will. One walks up to the waters edge , and knows they are going to have to crop in on the duck , and that they have to deal with the light that's available when he takes off. So you want to know how smooth and detailed , you can get the image, for the shutter speed you're forced to use,,, right? You could be correct the results could be close enough to be moot , its just that comparison [U]as done[/U], doesn't allow one to to come to that conclusion [U]based on this comparison ,[/U] in the situation I would like to know about , mostly because the lenses aren't the same. [/QUOTE]

Verification