Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Vincent" data-source="post: 633117" data-attributes="member: 15675">A summary for the OP: You do have a nice set of lenses, good that is important.1) For low light wide-normal applications: D750; for wildlife and sports: D500  => you alone can say where your priority is + both are capable all rounders 2) Waiting for the D750 replacement, is a matter of finance. The D750 will lose value faster with a new model coming out, but that will not change the performance of the D750.My opinion: both together do not make sense to me: they are too close.I`m working towards 3 bodies (probably overkill):1) Reach and fast AF: I now have the D500 and do understand no better is available.2) ISO + Colour and tone depth: I now have the Sony A7S, a DF or Dx(s) would be better with my Nikon lenses, but that I can not justify3) Resolution: For what I use it does not make sense, but NAS is strong.The D750 and D500 both have good scores in all 3 categories looking at evaluations. If I would complement it would be a specialised camera, like a DF or D800E.Just an other opinion: A D7500 is a camera with D500 ISO performance and D7200 AF performance in a small cheaper then D500 package, aimed at people that do not need 2 memory cards. => my conclusion is it is fantastic. It is up to everyone to see if that fits them.Must agree that the AF-P introduction seems to be a communication nightmare.</blockquote>