Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 383729" data-attributes="member: 12496">I use PS CS6&nbsp; Bridge/Raw, because that is what I have.&nbsp;&nbsp; I love it.&nbsp; Awesome power.&nbsp; I tried hard to like Lightroom, but the Raw part is the same (same module, same revision, I think same everything).&nbsp; The difference seems to be the &quot;organization&quot; part, which totally confused me.&nbsp; Old dogs, new tricks, but I am very happy with Bridge.&nbsp; And very happy with the power of Photoshop on those few occasions that are appropriate.&nbsp; I do always use the batch mode of PS to resample and output the Raw to JPG, but assume Lightroom has something like that too.If I were starting from scratch today, then I'd have to learn to like Lightroom, its cost is greatly more feasible.&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 383729, member: 12496"] I use PS CS6 Bridge/Raw, because that is what I have. I love it. Awesome power. I tried hard to like Lightroom, but the Raw part is the same (same module, same revision, I think same everything). The difference seems to be the "organization" part, which totally confused me. Old dogs, new tricks, but I am very happy with Bridge. And very happy with the power of Photoshop on those few occasions that are appropriate. I do always use the batch mode of PS to resample and output the Raw to JPG, but assume Lightroom has something like that too. If I were starting from scratch today, then I'd have to learn to like Lightroom, its cost is greatly more feasible. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification