Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DrEntropy" data-source="post: 383711" data-attributes="member: 34172">I really love photoshop, and enjoy the kinds of creative things you can do with it. I had been using photoshop for quite a while before getting back into the &quot;light acquisition&quot; (i.e. DSLR) side of things.&nbsp; However, my DSLR workflow is centered around lightroom.&nbsp; This is sort of an accident.... I only recently am returned to the world of photography, and jumped in with both feet instead of learning more like I probably should have. I started shooting raw, and just assumed that lightroom was what you were &quot;supposed&quot; to use the initial &quot;developing&quot; of the raw format images. &nbsp;After I started using LR, I really like the way it helps me keep my images organized, and so still use it for most (quick) processing of images.&nbsp; For images that need more (HDR, layers, special healing, content aware fill etc) I will use photoshop.&nbsp; In those cases I only do minimal processing (exposure / color balance) in lightroom before moving over to photoshop, perhaps add a bit of 'clarity'.&nbsp;&nbsp; But I am still developing (so to speak) this workflow <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Should I be using bridge / Raw instead?&nbsp; I am never sure, but I will probably stick with what i am doing for now.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DrEntropy, post: 383711, member: 34172"] I really love photoshop, and enjoy the kinds of creative things you can do with it. I had been using photoshop for quite a while before getting back into the "light acquisition" (i.e. DSLR) side of things. However, my DSLR workflow is centered around lightroom. This is sort of an accident.... I only recently am returned to the world of photography, and jumped in with both feet instead of learning more like I probably should have. I started shooting raw, and just assumed that lightroom was what you were "supposed" to use the initial "developing" of the raw format images. After I started using LR, I really like the way it helps me keep my images organized, and so still use it for most (quick) processing of images. For images that need more (HDR, layers, special healing, content aware fill etc) I will use photoshop. In those cases I only do minimal processing (exposure / color balance) in lightroom before moving over to photoshop, perhaps add a bit of 'clarity'. But I am still developing (so to speak) this workflow :) Should I be using bridge / Raw instead? I am never sure, but I will probably stick with what i am doing for now. [/QUOTE]

Verification