Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Wedding
Which processing for this image
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wud" data-source="post: 222057" data-attributes="member: 13578"><p>I know <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> The client are happy and we are both satisfied with the rest of the images (family and wedding portraits). And I do know this was a learning experience, and at least now I know some of the stuff I shouldn't be doing in this tiny room. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The room is tiny, no natural light at all. High sealing, awful colors on the walls (sorry, but I really think). Behind me, guests are standing, the room was pretty packed. Besides me, the guy who did the ceremony are standing. Not much I could do - besides using a way better flash with a good softbox, and a higher aperture. </p><p></p><p>I only used the 35mm for this ceremony. And I LOVE this lens, so my problem where mostly the lack of natural light. Or at least a prober artificial light (which they have not, its pretty dark in there). </p><p></p><p>Last, but not least, the room are way to hot, so everybody starts to sweat after a few minutes, clearly a bad combination when using flash. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Most images are f/7.1 and this should have been higher. Shutter are around 1/200, which of course are due to the flash I used (SB700 with the small softener you can pull out). I mostly bounced the flash up at the seiling and then in PP, gave a some more light at the bottom of the images (so clearly, not enough power on the flash).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wud, post: 222057, member: 13578"] I know :) The client are happy and we are both satisfied with the rest of the images (family and wedding portraits). And I do know this was a learning experience, and at least now I know some of the stuff I shouldn't be doing in this tiny room. The room is tiny, no natural light at all. High sealing, awful colors on the walls (sorry, but I really think). Behind me, guests are standing, the room was pretty packed. Besides me, the guy who did the ceremony are standing. Not much I could do - besides using a way better flash with a good softbox, and a higher aperture. I only used the 35mm for this ceremony. And I LOVE this lens, so my problem where mostly the lack of natural light. Or at least a prober artificial light (which they have not, its pretty dark in there). Last, but not least, the room are way to hot, so everybody starts to sweat after a few minutes, clearly a bad combination when using flash. Most images are f/7.1 and this should have been higher. Shutter are around 1/200, which of course are due to the flash I used (SB700 with the small softener you can pull out). I mostly bounced the flash up at the seiling and then in PP, gave a some more light at the bottom of the images (so clearly, not enough power on the flash). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Wedding
Which processing for this image
Top