Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 321498" data-attributes="member: 13090">It helps the shooter in question is my girlfriend and that I can compare her old shots with her new. It's also convenient she rarely shoots with anything other than the 35mm f/1.8G she liberated from my camera bag. This being the case, it's relatively simple for me to compare images that are quite similar as far as things like lens, aperture and ISO are concerned. And, based on what I've seen, there's a mighty big difference. Yes, it could be attributed to something else, but it seems to me the biggest change in quality is probably precipitated by the biggest change in the two cameras that would affect image sharpness and that would be the removal of the OLPF to my way of thinking. I fully admit this line of thought is not scientifically &quot;air tight&quot; but I'm talking solely about overall image sharpness and nothing else.......</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 321498, member: 13090"] It helps the shooter in question is my girlfriend and that I can compare her old shots with her new. It's also convenient she rarely shoots with anything other than the 35mm f/1.8G she liberated from my camera bag. This being the case, it's relatively simple for me to compare images that are quite similar as far as things like lens, aperture and ISO are concerned. And, based on what I've seen, there's a mighty big difference. Yes, it could be attributed to something else, but it seems to me the biggest change in quality is probably precipitated by the biggest change in the two cameras that would affect image sharpness and that would be the removal of the OLPF to my way of thinking. I fully admit this line of thought is not scientifically "air tight" but I'm talking solely about overall image sharpness and nothing else. [COLOR=#ffffff]...[/COLOR] [COLOR=#ffffff]...[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification