Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 321485" data-attributes="member: 13090">I've seen the difference first hand between shots taken with a D3200 (with an OLPF) and a D5300 (no OLPF) and TegG954 is correct, the difference is huge. I was shocked to see how much cleaner shots taken with the D5300 looked when compared to ones taken with the D3200 and I'm talking hundreds of shots taken over a period of a few months. Removing the OLPF is a very big deal in my experience.I suggested the D5300 over the D3300 based on a feeling that video would be a big use of this camera, and if that's the case, I'll stand by that suggestion. It's neck and neck but if the main thrust of the camera will be stills, and video is less of a consideration, then I'd have a hard time choosing one over the other and could be swung over to suggesting the D3300 pretty easily. There really are no bad choices when it comes to these two cameras....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 321485, member: 13090"] I've seen the difference first hand between shots taken with a D3200 (with an OLPF) and a D5300 (no OLPF) and [B]TegG954[/B] is correct, the difference is huge. I was shocked to see how much cleaner shots taken with the D5300 looked when compared to ones taken with the D3200 and I'm talking hundreds of shots taken over a period of a few months. Removing the OLPF is a very big deal in my experience. I suggested the D5300 over the D3300 based on a feeling that video would be a big use of this camera, and if that's the case, I'll stand by that suggestion. It's neck and neck but if the main thrust of the camera will be stills, and video is less of a consideration, then I'd have a hard time choosing one over the other and could be swung over to suggesting the D3300 pretty easily. There really are no bad choices when it comes to these two cameras. [COLOR=#ffffff]...[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification