Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 492951" data-attributes="member: 12496">You think we don't?&nbsp; DxO?&nbsp; Rating a lens lower because it was tested on a lower sensor resolution?&nbsp;&nbsp; How is that even about the lens?&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />If we can't see it, then why not?&nbsp; At least for our own use?&nbsp; Saves $2000. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I see easy differences in some lenses, but Nikons lossy NEF compression has to be about my very least problem, not even on the list.&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 492951, member: 12496"] You think we don't? DxO? Rating a lens lower because it was tested on a lower sensor resolution? How is that even about the lens? :) If we can't see it, then why not? At least for our own use? Saves $2000. :) I see easy differences in some lenses, but Nikons lossy NEF compression has to be about my very least problem, not even on the list. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification