Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Which lens Sigma 17-50mm/f2.8 or Nikon 24-70mm/f2.8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bukitimah" data-source="post: 42539" data-attributes="member: 7507"><p>Yes, the 17-50 f2.8 is the way to go. I am using the D300 and previously owned the kit lens 18-105. Although it is a fantastic lens, it can't perform under low light without flash. </p><p></p><p>I have since replace it with a Tamron 17-50 f2.8 non VC. For this range, I don't think VC is critical. My nikon 50 mm f1.8 also has no VR. Going up to 200 and above, VR becomes important I think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bukitimah, post: 42539, member: 7507"] Yes, the 17-50 f2.8 is the way to go. I am using the D300 and previously owned the kit lens 18-105. Although it is a fantastic lens, it can't perform under low light without flash. I have since replace it with a Tamron 17-50 f2.8 non VC. For this range, I don't think VC is critical. My nikon 50 mm f1.8 also has no VR. Going up to 200 and above, VR becomes important I think. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Which lens Sigma 17-50mm/f2.8 or Nikon 24-70mm/f2.8
Top