Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="clarnibass" data-source="post: 61251" data-attributes="member: 9831">HiI will probably be getting one of the G 50mm lenses (or a Sigma if I can actually try it and see it's good). I looked at some comparisons and it seems the f/1.8 is a bit sharper but the f/1.4 is better at 1.4 <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />It will replace my current non-Nikkor f/1.4 lens. I sometimes use ISO 3200 at f/1.4 and often get borderline shutter speed (i.e. just fast enough and sometimes not). Hopefully with my new camera I will be able to use higher ISO. 3200 is already borderline most of the time on my camera and my new one should be at least one stop better (i.e. 1600 on my current camera looks somewhere between 3200 and 6400 on the camera I'm going to get).Is the 1.8G significantly better than the 1.4G at 1.8?Thanks</blockquote>

[QUOTE="clarnibass, post: 61251, member: 9831"] Hi I will probably be getting one of the G 50mm lenses (or a Sigma if I can actually try it and see it's good). I looked at some comparisons and it seems the f/1.8 is a bit sharper but the f/1.4 is better at 1.4 :) It will replace my current non-Nikkor f/1.4 lens. I sometimes use ISO 3200 at f/1.4 and often get borderline shutter speed (i.e. just fast enough and sometimes not). Hopefully with my new camera I will be able to use higher ISO. 3200 is already borderline most of the time on my camera and my new one should be at least one stop better (i.e. 1600 on my current camera looks somewhere between 3200 and 6400 on the camera I'm going to get). Is the 1.8G significantly better than the 1.4G at 1.8? Thanks [/QUOTE]

Verification