Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
What's your opinion of shooting weddings with DX?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 536933" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>Zach admits in his video that FX delivers better bokeh and that FX has better dynamic range. Not a lot in his opinion but better nonetheless. So from a factual, objective standpoint he's saying FX is better. From a subjective "in my opinion" standpoint he states the differences are small; which I guess is debatable. Everyone has opinions obviously.</p><p></p><p>He also points out how technology has vastly improved the quality and capability of DX sensors. What he fails to point out is how the same technology improving DX sensors is also improving FX sensors. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander after all. </p><p></p><p>DX has the "crop factor" which can be handy, but wide angle focal lengths are truly wide on FX so I consider the "crop factor" two sides of the same coin and a moot point in the final analysis.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying DX isn't an entirely capable format, clearly it is; but from a purely technical standpoint I don't see what DX can do that FX can't, and possibly do better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 536933, member: 13090"] Zach admits in his video that FX delivers better bokeh and that FX has better dynamic range. Not a lot in his opinion but better nonetheless. So from a factual, objective standpoint he's saying FX is better. From a subjective "in my opinion" standpoint he states the differences are small; which I guess is debatable. Everyone has opinions obviously. He also points out how technology has vastly improved the quality and capability of DX sensors. What he fails to point out is how the same technology improving DX sensors is also improving FX sensors. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander after all. DX has the "crop factor" which can be handy, but wide angle focal lengths are truly wide on FX so I consider the "crop factor" two sides of the same coin and a moot point in the final analysis. I'm not saying DX isn't an entirely capable format, clearly it is; but from a purely technical standpoint I don't see what DX can do that FX can't, and possibly do better. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
What's your opinion of shooting weddings with DX?
Top