Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
What's your opinion of shooting weddings with DX?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aroy" data-source="post: 536044" data-attributes="member: 16090"><p>As long as you have fast glass there is nothing that prevents you from shooting weddings with DX. The major advantages of FX over DX (of the same generation) are</p><p>. Lower noise at high ISO. If you are going to shoot with strobes/flash that does not matter much as current DX are good enough at ISO 400/800</p><p>. Wider FOV with wides. You can fit in wider groups at the same focal length. If you use 24-70 then the wide angle shots will be less wide.</p><p>. Better battery life, at least in most cases.</p><p></p><p>Here in India for quite some time the D300 and then D90 was a favourite with mid level photographers, of course all of them shot with either flash or strobes. Now of course every one has a d800/D810. Most of the Canon shooters also use strobes here. If you are not going to use external lights/flash/strobe, then low noise at high ISO is an advantage, but that can be overcome with faster glass. I personally have used the 35MM F1.8 DX exclusively at F1.8 in thousands of indoor shots, most without flash/strobes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aroy, post: 536044, member: 16090"] As long as you have fast glass there is nothing that prevents you from shooting weddings with DX. The major advantages of FX over DX (of the same generation) are . Lower noise at high ISO. If you are going to shoot with strobes/flash that does not matter much as current DX are good enough at ISO 400/800 . Wider FOV with wides. You can fit in wider groups at the same focal length. If you use 24-70 then the wide angle shots will be less wide. . Better battery life, at least in most cases. Here in India for quite some time the D300 and then D90 was a favourite with mid level photographers, of course all of them shot with either flash or strobes. Now of course every one has a d800/D810. Most of the Canon shooters also use strobes here. If you are not going to use external lights/flash/strobe, then low noise at high ISO is an advantage, but that can be overcome with faster glass. I personally have used the 35MM F1.8 DX exclusively at F1.8 in thousands of indoor shots, most without flash/strobes. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
What's your opinion of shooting weddings with DX?
Top