Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="nikonbill" data-source="post: 846265" data-attributes="member: 47024">I recently purchased my D850 (before new are all gone) with the goal of it being very similar in layout (controls) and getting similar results as my D500 should something happen to it, and leave money for a 500pf in the future As Clovishound indicated and I find the same the 46mp FF and the 20mp APS-C create very similar results at the same subject distance so for me I met my goal. On noise - I find up to 12,000 ISO is very easy to midigate in post process with either body with the D500 being slightly easier (less aggressive de-noising) on a serious crop. It is slight however but note able. Personal opinion it's advancement in camera processors are what made Nikon focus on FF as they could reduce noise after the photo is taken more easily. Once you find a post processing software you like, getting that noise reduced is very easy</blockquote>

[QUOTE="nikonbill, post: 846265, member: 47024"] I recently purchased my D850 (before new are all gone) with the goal of it being very similar in layout (controls) and getting similar results as my D500 should something happen to it, and leave money for a 500pf in the future As Clovishound indicated and I find the same the 46mp FF and the 20mp APS-C create very similar results at the same subject distance so for me I met my goal. On noise - I find up to 12,000 ISO is very easy to midigate in post process with either body with the D500 being slightly easier (less aggressive de-noising) on a serious crop. It is slight however but note able. Personal opinion it's advancement in camera processors are what made Nikon focus on FF as they could reduce noise after the photo is taken more easily. Once you find a post processing software you like, getting that noise reduced is very easy [/QUOTE]

Verification