Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
What to do?? The next lens in the stable.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RocketCowboy" data-source="post: 670266" data-attributes="member: 25095"><p>I gotta agree here.</p><p></p><p>First, I hear lots of good things about the 70-200/f4 from people who cover events and value the weight savings while still getting great IQ with just 1 stop less light. The only problem is that Nikon’s 70-200/f4 is basically the same cost as Tamron’s 70-200/f2.8 G2...so who wouldn’t take the extra speed?</p><p></p><p>I used the 105/2.8 for this week’s flower challenge, and really like how it performed. AND, the 85/1.8 is a fantastic portrait lens, and also very light wight!</p><p></p><p>I don’t know. The 70-300 is part of my usual travel kit, along with the 24-120 and 16-35, so it would be hard to give up that lens just due to the portability and range it offers.</p><p></p><p>Maybe your wife needs the Tamron 18-400 instead, and then hands off your glass! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RocketCowboy, post: 670266, member: 25095"] I gotta agree here. First, I hear lots of good things about the 70-200/f4 from people who cover events and value the weight savings while still getting great IQ with just 1 stop less light. The only problem is that Nikon’s 70-200/f4 is basically the same cost as Tamron’s 70-200/f2.8 G2...so who wouldn’t take the extra speed? I used the 105/2.8 for this week’s flower challenge, and really like how it performed. AND, the 85/1.8 is a fantastic portrait lens, and also very light wight! I don’t know. The 70-300 is part of my usual travel kit, along with the 24-120 and 16-35, so it would be hard to give up that lens just due to the portability and range it offers. Maybe your wife needs the Tamron 18-400 instead, and then hands off your glass! :D Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
What to do?? The next lens in the stable.
Top