Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="gohan2091" data-source="post: 256353" data-attributes="member: 11990">I do not think what you said in your message is what I said <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /> I am fully aware of how to get a blurred background with DX cameras. I own two fast lens with a 1.8 and 2.8 maximum aperture. Getting closer to the subject does help blur the background as does having the background further away from the subject. Telephoto focal lenghts such as 200mm and 300mm throws out the background a bit too. I look at photos taken with a full frame camera and those taken with a crop sensor and the full frame seems to have a shallower depth of field at smaller apertures (F5.6, F8 etc).Yes, most real pros won't advertise in the free-ads but I am not a pro. As I said, I've shot 5 Weddings and none have them involve spending all day with them and certainly not getting up at dawn. I appreciate that this does happen but I have not encountered it at all so far. The longest Wedding I photograph was 9 hours and most of that was due to the reception and music/party at the end. The ceremony itself was very short and I wasn't required in the morning.Sure, <a href="http://www.gumtree.com/p/business-services/semi-professional-photographer-looking-for-further-experience/1042666663" target="_blank">Semi-Professional Photographer Looking For Further Experience | Norwich | Gumtree</a> thanks!</blockquote>

Verification