Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Moab Man" data-source="post: 110614" data-attributes="member: 11881">This question is just mental chewing gum as to if a superior lens can steroid a camera beyond its given ability. Or... Dude! It ain't helping.Taking the photographer out of the equation; which makes the better picture?1. Lets say D3100-7000 with a prime lens? Does superior glass elevate the quality of the photos that is clearly recognizable? 2. Example camera: D600 with a standard lens? Does this higher end camera make for a better picture and (not that it's actually possible) seemingly push a standard lens to a much higher quality photograph because of its better internals?3. Doesn't matter. One half of the sum will not make for any appreciable difference without the other half?If you so choose to participate in this mental chewing gum please dispose of your gum properly and not on the bottom of the keyboard.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Moab Man, post: 110614, member: 11881"] This question is just mental chewing gum as to if a superior lens can steroid a camera beyond its given ability. Or... Dude! It ain't helping. Taking the photographer out of the equation; which makes the better picture? 1. Lets say D3100-7000 with a prime lens? Does superior glass elevate the quality of the photos that is clearly recognizable? 2. Example camera: D600 with a standard lens? Does this higher end camera make for a better picture and (not that it's actually possible) seemingly push a standard lens to a much higher quality photograph because of its better internals? 3. Doesn't matter. One half of the sum will not make for any appreciable difference without the other half? If you so choose to participate in this mental chewing gum please dispose of your gum properly and not on the bottom of the keyboard. [/QUOTE]

Verification