Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="wev" data-source="post: 405920" data-attributes="member: 16783"><p>Well, its meaning has changed many times since Daguerre and his ilk began fiddling with light. The concept of Art Photography didn't exist in any real sense before Steglitz kicked it into being around 1905. And then the east coast boys and girls said that was all hog wash in the '30s. And the west coast did the same in the '60s. Which "Photography" do you want to use as the REAL one? As I said, it is just a person employing a process. The conception, mechanics, and results achieved are something entirely different, both slippery and entirely subjective. This is the stuff PhD's are made of (which is why I declined mine).</p></blockquote><p></p>