Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
What is the reason behind the "50mm prime" theory?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 197871" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>I would argue while field of view and perspective are *related* they are *not* the same thing. </p><p></p><p>Field of view simply does not change linear perspective and nothing in that statement contradicts the above definition. Linear perspective can demonstrated. Lets use a photo example. Same shot, different crop, but both show the same <em>linear perspective</em>, e.g. the red fence appears no closer to the tracks in Perspective #2 than it does in Perspective #1; neither does the white tent. The Vanishing Point also remains the same in both shots. Both of these shots have the same linear perspective because the camera's position has not changed. Changing location changes perspective, while cropping changes Field of View. Elements appear larger in the one shot, only because the entire frame has been re-sized to equal that of the other and I have to wonder if that isn't part of what confuses some people.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">......</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 197871, member: 13090"] I would argue while field of view and perspective are *related* they are *not* the same thing. Field of view simply does not change linear perspective and nothing in that statement contradicts the above definition. Linear perspective can demonstrated. Lets use a photo example. Same shot, different crop, but both show the same [I]linear perspective[/I], e.g. the red fence appears no closer to the tracks in Perspective #2 than it does in Perspective #1; neither does the white tent. The Vanishing Point also remains the same in both shots. Both of these shots have the same linear perspective because the camera's position has not changed. Changing location changes perspective, while cropping changes Field of View. Elements appear larger in the one shot, only because the entire frame has been re-sized to equal that of the other and I have to wonder if that isn't part of what confuses some people. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"]......[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
What is the reason behind the "50mm prime" theory?
Top