Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
What is the most important criterion?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruidoso Bill" data-source="post: 9309" data-attributes="member: 753"><p>When I look at a photo, being somewhat a photographer, I automatically look at the mechanics. For example exposure, focus and even basic composition. If the image is good in these areas, it is then an excellent candidate for extra treatment for dramatic or artistic effect. We all dump the really bad shots from the getgo I think. It's more than just salvaging a poor photo. We know if it is exposure we can correct some of it, focus we can sharpen or soften. etc. We can crop to improve the balance or whatever but if it is a real barker, we dump it. Back in my film days I remeber being in the pursuit, believe it or not, in grain. I wanted grain for a certain candlelit shot I was imagining. I cranked up tri-x to do this. Now we look at a high iso shot and see some noise it is automatically a poor image. I guess what I am trying to say is a good image is usually good enough on it's own merits to be a keeper.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruidoso Bill, post: 9309, member: 753"] When I look at a photo, being somewhat a photographer, I automatically look at the mechanics. For example exposure, focus and even basic composition. If the image is good in these areas, it is then an excellent candidate for extra treatment for dramatic or artistic effect. We all dump the really bad shots from the getgo I think. It's more than just salvaging a poor photo. We know if it is exposure we can correct some of it, focus we can sharpen or soften. etc. We can crop to improve the balance or whatever but if it is a real barker, we dump it. Back in my film days I remeber being in the pursuit, believe it or not, in grain. I wanted grain for a certain candlelit shot I was imagining. I cranked up tri-x to do this. Now we look at a high iso shot and see some noise it is automatically a poor image. I guess what I am trying to say is a good image is usually good enough on it's own merits to be a keeper. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
What is the most important criterion?
Top