Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Vital Spark" data-source="post: 9302" data-attributes="member: 668">I wasn't thinking so much of photojournalism, or genres of any kind.&nbsp;I am sure that Robert Capa did not make his exposures on D-Day with a full measure of his conscious method (although if you look at the images from the two surviving rolls, they are for the most part framed and composed remarkably well for the atmosphere in which they were shot); and I&nbsp; would think that considering the number of practitioners, and the array of equipment they tote, sports photography is very much concerned with technical values in their end product.&nbsp;I was querying which aspects of quotidian photographs resonate most strongly.&nbsp;So, to rephrase: Does a casually shot image of the pyramids have more value as an eye object&nbsp; than a carefully lit and conscientiously composed photo of a flower? </blockquote>

[QUOTE="Vital Spark, post: 9302, member: 668"] [FONT=Verdana]I wasn't thinking so much of photojournalism, or genres of any kind.[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana][/FONT][FONT=Verdana]I am sure that Robert Capa did not make his exposures on D-Day with a full measure of his conscious method (although if you look at the images from the two surviving rolls, they are for the most part framed and composed remarkably well for the atmosphere in which they were shot); and I would think that considering the number of practitioners, and the array of equipment they tote, sports photography is very much concerned with technical values in their end product.[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]I was querying which aspects of quotidian photographs resonate most strongly.[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]So, to rephrase: Does a casually shot image of the pyramids have more value as an eye object than a carefully lit and conscientiously composed photo of a flower? [/FONT] [/QUOTE]

Verification