Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Em11y" data-source="post: 1516" data-attributes="member: 339">I would generally agree with the above, however I use a sigma 70-300 OS and I find it to be very good, I suppose you get what you pay for, if you go with the higher end more expensive lenses then the result will show in your picturesI had a Tamron version of this lens, what a horrible let down, soft pictures, no IS/OS and slow AF, generally not that great (traded it in for the sigma)Haven't tried the Nikkor, heard it is very good thoughIn my conclusion, try each one before you buy, work out your budget and try to get the &quot;better one&quot; if you can<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />&nbsp;I generally don't skimp on kit, If I can't afford &quot;the best&quot; then I'll wait until I can <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Em11y, post: 1516, member: 339"] I would generally agree with the above, however I use a sigma 70-300 OS and I find it to be very good, I suppose you get what you pay for, if you go with the higher end more expensive lenses then the result will show in your pictures I had a Tamron version of this lens, what a horrible let down, soft pictures, no IS/OS and slow AF, generally not that great (traded it in for the sigma) Haven't tried the Nikkor, heard it is very good though In my conclusion, try each one before you buy, work out your budget and try to get the "better one" if you can :) I generally don't skimp on kit, If I can't afford "the best" then I'll wait until I can :) [/QUOTE]

Verification