Hello everyone.
I just got a new d7000 and am using the 18-200 VRII for general purpose and daily use. I have read from those that seem far more knowledgeable than myself that a 50mm prime is a must have for sharp pics and low light shots of various sorts.
My question is, there are a couple of Nikon 50's I'm looking at; AF 50mm 1.8 and the AF 50mm 1.4. The 1.4 is a great deal more money and am wondering if there is a significant difference ?
Also, Sigma and Tamron make a great deal of lenses and am wondering if those should be considered.
I would like a good value for a 50mm prime for low light and sharp imaging.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks,
ANDY
I just got a new d7000 and am using the 18-200 VRII for general purpose and daily use. I have read from those that seem far more knowledgeable than myself that a 50mm prime is a must have for sharp pics and low light shots of various sorts.
My question is, there are a couple of Nikon 50's I'm looking at; AF 50mm 1.8 and the AF 50mm 1.4. The 1.4 is a great deal more money and am wondering if there is a significant difference ?
Also, Sigma and Tamron make a great deal of lenses and am wondering if those should be considered.
I would like a good value for a 50mm prime for low light and sharp imaging.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks,
ANDY