Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
What is appropriate watermarking?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DraganDL" data-source="post: 269627" data-attributes="member: 18251"><p>@<span style="color: #444444"><a href="http://nikonites.com/member-6277-don-kuykendall.html" target="_blank">Don Kuykendall</a>: but, your watermark (on the photo of those metal gates) can be very easily removed. For me, watermarking is pretty useless - it presents an obstacle to the viewer and does not prevent the photo to be (completely or partially) edited...</span><span style="color: #444444">Anyway, if anybody happen to sue someone over alleged theft of a photo, I'm sure there are other sorts of evidence to be used for the purpose...</span></p><p><span style="color: #444444"></span></p><p><span style="color: #444444">The major problem is the photo's aesthetics: EVERYTHING (every little thing!) that is in the photo is a PART of that photo. Adding ANY EXPLICIT, recognizable detail to the photo (such as a letter or a word, among the other things) is highly questionable. It is not like regular editing in terms of removing spots caused by dust on the sensor or changing certain "technical" parameters etc. ...</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DraganDL, post: 269627, member: 18251"] @[COLOR=#444444][URL="http://nikonites.com/member-6277-don-kuykendall.html"]Don Kuykendall[/URL]: but, your watermark (on the photo of those metal gates) can be very easily removed. For me, watermarking is pretty useless - it presents an obstacle to the viewer and does not prevent the photo to be (completely or partially) edited...[/COLOR][COLOR=#444444]Anyway, if anybody happen to sue someone over alleged theft of a photo, I'm sure there are other sorts of evidence to be used for the purpose... The major problem is the photo's aesthetics: EVERYTHING (every little thing!) that is in the photo is a PART of that photo. Adding ANY EXPLICIT, recognizable detail to the photo (such as a letter or a word, among the other things) is highly questionable. It is not like regular editing in terms of removing spots caused by dust on the sensor or changing certain "technical" parameters etc. ...[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Business
What is appropriate watermarking?
Top