Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
What is a good portrait lens for a d3100
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 373343" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>Just to clarify, when I say the 50mm is not a portrait lens I'm referring specifically to shooting head, head & shoulder shots on up to about half-body portraits. It wouldn't be my first choice for three-quarter body shots either but it's passable. Anything beyond that, as in full-body shots or wider, sure; use your "Nifty 50" (with alacrity!) </p><p></p><p>The main reason I say this, again, is because the 50mm focal length simply does not create enough compression. That lack of compression creates perspective issues and introduces unflattering distortion, <em>especially</em> in head/H&S shots. The other issue is working distance. To get good H&S portraits with a 50mm you need to be about six feet away from your subject and that's simply not enough. It's awkward for the photographer and it's too "all up" in your subjects personal space. Using an 85mm you should be able to get good H&S shots ten or twelve feet from your subject; a much more comfortable working distance for all.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #ffffff">...</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 373343, member: 13090"] Just to clarify, when I say the 50mm is not a portrait lens I'm referring specifically to shooting head, head & shoulder shots on up to about half-body portraits. It wouldn't be my first choice for three-quarter body shots either but it's passable. Anything beyond that, as in full-body shots or wider, sure; use your "Nifty 50" (with alacrity!) The main reason I say this, again, is because the 50mm focal length simply does not create enough compression. That lack of compression creates perspective issues and introduces unflattering distortion, [I]especially[/I] in head/H&S shots. The other issue is working distance. To get good H&S portraits with a 50mm you need to be about six feet away from your subject and that's simply not enough. It's awkward for the photographer and it's too "all up" in your subjects personal space. Using an 85mm you should be able to get good H&S shots ten or twelve feet from your subject; a much more comfortable working distance for all. [COLOR=#ffffff]...[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
What is a good portrait lens for a d3100
Top