Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
What I Don't Need (But Want Really Badly)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whiskeyman" data-source="post: 646734" data-attributes="member: 13556"><p>Actually, I do believe that it has been pointed out that the higher pixel-count sensor cameras will test the photographer's capabilities, especially when hand-holding the camera. </p><p></p><p>The density of the D7200 is higher than the D850; with the same pixel density as the D7200, the D850 (or any FX-format sensor) would have a 54.45 MP sensor. The D500's pixel density would be 47 MP on an FX sensor, also greater than the D850's. Any of these higher density sensors are very unforgiving of a non-stable shooting platform, and will expose camera and lens movement more readily than a lower-pixel-count sensor. </p><p></p><p>I would think that in this case, the exposure of shooting flaws would also exist. Maybe we should be incorporating these techniques suggested for the D850 for other cameras as well.</p><p></p><p>WM</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whiskeyman, post: 646734, member: 13556"] Actually, I do believe that it has been pointed out that the higher pixel-count sensor cameras will test the photographer's capabilities, especially when hand-holding the camera. The density of the D7200 is higher than the D850; with the same pixel density as the D7200, the D850 (or any FX-format sensor) would have a 54.45 MP sensor. The D500's pixel density would be 47 MP on an FX sensor, also greater than the D850's. Any of these higher density sensors are very unforgiving of a non-stable shooting platform, and will expose camera and lens movement more readily than a lower-pixel-count sensor. I would think that in this case, the exposure of shooting flaws would also exist. Maybe we should be incorporating these techniques suggested for the D850 for other cameras as well. WM [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
What I Don't Need (But Want Really Badly)
Top
