Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
What I Don't Need (But Want Really Badly)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whiskeyman" data-source="post: 645951" data-attributes="member: 13556"><p>If that <em>is</em> the case, then the Nikon 200-500 is the choice to make. Which is what I've told myself, but... sometimes I think I'm lying to myself.</p><p></p><p>And I do have the 300 f/2.8 and 1.4 and 2.0 teleconverters. I just haven't been pleased with them on the 300mm. Maybe instead of a lens purchase, I need to send the lens to Nikon for a checkup and tuneup. That plus the D850 are still less than two of the three lenses by about $1000.</p><p></p><p>WM</p><p></p><p>WM</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whiskeyman, post: 645951, member: 13556"] If that [I]is[/I] the case, then the Nikon 200-500 is the choice to make. Which is what I've told myself, but... sometimes I think I'm lying to myself. And I do have the 300 f/2.8 and 1.4 and 2.0 teleconverters. I just haven't been pleased with them on the 300mm. Maybe instead of a lens purchase, I need to send the lens to Nikon for a checkup and tuneup. That plus the D850 are still less than two of the three lenses by about $1000. WM WM [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
What I Don't Need (But Want Really Badly)
Top